“Removing this monument isn’t a choice to erase our history, it’s a choice to embrace our future.”
Protests against racial injustice sweeping across the country and the world have renewed the debate over why some states still display memorials to the Confederate States of America.
The civil unrest has led some states and other organizations to take action in recent weeks. Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam announced the state would remove a state of Gen. Robert E. Lee in Richmond, and protesters toppled a statue of Confederate President Jefferson Davis there Wednesday. The University of Alabama also committed to taking down memorials to Confederate soldiers. The U.S. Marine Corps (and NASCAR!) announced a ban on public displays of the Confederate battle flag.
And in Arizona, Secretary of State Katie Hobbs is calling for a memorial outside the state Capitol to be removed.
In a letter to the director of the state’s Department of Administration, Hobbs said the monument is “undeserving” of its placement next to tributes to leaders like Martin Luther King Jr., Navajo Codetalkers, and the Granite Mountain Hotshots.
The memorial was gifted to the state by the United Daughters of the Confederacy — a group that has received scrutiny for its skewed retelling of history, including claims that the role slavery played in the Civil War is overstated.
Historians have pointed out that many memorials to the Confederacy were not installed immediately after the war’s conclusion – rather, they were erected during times when racial tensions were high. Arizona’s memorial at the Capitol, as well as the naming of Robert E. Lee Street, were dedicated in the early 1960s, in the middle of the civil rights movement.
“Removing this monument isn’t a choice to erase our history, it’s a choice to embrace our future,” Hobbs said in a tweet Monday.
- Jefferson Davis Highway Marker in Gold Canyon
- East Robert E. Lee Street in Phoenix
- Confederate Memorial in Picacho
- Picacho Peak Confederate Monument in Picacho
Arizona was not yet a state during the Civil War, but it does have some ties to the conflict. The two monuments in Picacho, an unincorporated community about 60 miles southeast of Phoenix, are at the site of the westernmost Civil War clash, the Battle of Picacho Pass.
The Arizona Republic has also reported on a monument for Confederate soldiers at Dragoon Springs near Tucson, an Arizona Confederate veterans’ memorial in Sierra Vista, and another memorial to Confederate veterans in a Phoenix cemetery.
A Longstanding Controversy
Black leaders have fought for years to remove these Confederate memorials throughout the state.
In 2017, after a man drove into a crowd of people protesting racism in North Carolina, East Valley NAACP spokeswoman Collette Watson said the symbols “intimidate, terrorize and strike fear in the hearts of Arizonans, particularly African-Americans, while inspiring and emboldening white supremacists.”
State Rep. Reginald Bolding, D-Laveen, has been calling for the Capitol memorial’s removal since 2015, after a white supremacist fatally shot nine Black people in a South Carolina church.
Gov. Doug Ducey has said he has no interest in taking down Confederate memorials, as he sees them as important nods to history.
But Hobbs argues history is present enough in racial inequality.
“Without a doubt, the most shameful moments of our history should not be forgotten,” she said. “But we need not honor these shameful moments in order to remember them.”
Democratic leaders in the state have spoken out in support of Hobbs’ request, including Superintendent of Public Instruction Kathy Hoffman and multiple state lawmakers.
According to The Arizona Republic, the Department of Administration acknowledged it received Hobbs’ letter but has not yet taken a position on the issue.
Trump Wants Them Up
Despite an outpouring of calls for the federal government to rename Army bases named after Confederate leaders, President Donald Trump said Wednesday his administration will “not even consider” it.
“These Monumental and very Powerful Bases have become part of a Great American Heritage, a history of Winning, Victory, and Freedom,” Trump said on Twitter.
Not all military leaders shared this idea. Name changes have not been proposed by the Army or the Pentagon, but on Monday, Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy indicated in response to questions from reporters that they were “open to a bipartisan discussion” of renaming bases such as Fort Bragg in North Carolina and Fort Benning in Georgia.
Paul Eaton, a retired two-star Army general and a former commanding general of Fort Benning, said Trump’s statements go against ideals the Army stands for.
“Today, Donald Trump made it official. Rather than move this nation further away from institutionalized racism, he believes we should cling to it and its heritage, by keeping the names of racist traitors on the gates of our military bases,” Eaton said.
Peter Mansoor, a retired Army colonel and veteran of the Iraq war, said in an email exchange that renaming these bases is long overdue.
“Most serving soldiers know little about the history behind the Confederate leaders for whom these bases are named, or the political deals that caused them to be honored in this fashion,” he said. “There might be some pushback from a small segment of soldiers from the South, but this is what we like to call a ‘teachable moment.’ Now is the time to finally bring about a change that will speak volumes as to what the U.S. Army stands for.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Leading up to the 2016 election, Donald Trump crafted an image of himself as a successful businessman and a winner. But in reality, Trump has a long...
Nearly two years after the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, another court is using that ruling to go after one of the anti-abortion right’s...
Originally published by The 19th BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — LaTorya Beasley had her first child through in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 2022, and by...
Most Americans are familiar with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and our right to medical privacy. Do individuals...