Analysts Don’t Think Trump’s Payroll Tax Deferral Is Worth It for Arizona Businesses

A pedestrian with a takeout lunch in hand walks through an area of Scottsdale, Ariz., known for busy restaurants, bars and nightlife Tuesday, June 30, 2020, with most businesses closed for the next 30 days due to the surge in coronavirus cases in Arizona. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

By Camaron Stevenson, Olivia Munson

September 8, 2020

Employers that decide to take advantage of the payroll tax deferral will be leaving their workers to foot a big bill in April.

President Donald Trump’s payroll tax holiday started last Tuesday, but for analysts looking at the program, the holiday might as well involve a Secret Santa.

No one involved with the program – from the IRS to Arizona business organizations to Washington think tanks – could say how many businesses will actually participate in the voluntary program, and how many workers might be affected.

“You can’t simply flip a switch to make this work in the payroll department,” said Paul Van de Water, senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, citing just one of the many concerns critics have raised about the “holiday.”

The first is that, like most holidays, this one could come with a big bill in a couple of months.

Under the executive order, businesses are allowed to defer four months of Social Security withholding payments that normally come out of workers’ paychecks, and put that money back in the employees’ pockets. But it’s currently only a deferral – workers could get hit with a bill in 2021 to pay back all the withholding that was deferred.

“You could be forcing American workers into a situation that could result in a big tax bill next year, and yet it is a decision that will largely be made by employers,” said Garrick Taylor, executive vice president for the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce said the policy, which was unveiled less than four weeks ago, has raised such “serious concerns for both employers and employees” that it does not believe many businesses will opt in, choosing instead to keep withholding as always.

The White House had framed the executive order as an attempt to get financial help to Americans hit by COVID-19, and it would mean extra money for workers whose companies participate.

With Social Security withholding making up 6.2% of each paycheck, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce estimates that a deferral would mean an extra $83 per paycheck for someone making $35,000 a year and paid biweekly. It would be an increase of $248 per paycheck for someone making $104,000, the maximum income eligible for the deferral.

But all those savings, from $751.15 on the low end to $2,232 on the upper end, might have to be paid back by April 30 unless the deferral is made permanent – something Trump has vowed to do. His executive order directs the Treasury to “explore avenues, including legislation, to eliminate the obligation to pay the taxes deferred.”

Rep. Tom O’Halleran, D-Sedona, said Congress is not likely to sign off on an elimination of the payroll tax. People on both sides of the aisle would oppose such a move because it would hurt senior citizens, veterans and individuals with disabilities in the long run, he said.

“No matter who the president is, they need to go through Congress when you begin to impact the tax structure of the people,” O’Halleran said.

Critics say making the cuts permanent could endanger Social Security. But making people pay the deferred money in 2021 could also be problematic for low-income households, said Rachel Greszler, research fellow for the Heritage Foundation.

Greszler said it is unlikely that someone living paycheck-to-paycheck would be able to save for a day when the bill might come due. If Trump was trying to boost the economy, she said, it would make more sense to do another one-time stimulus payment.

“You are likely to spend a higher amount when you get it in a paycheck then when you get it in a lump sum,” she said.

O’Halleran echoed concerns that a short-term paycheck boost now might not be ideal in the long run. He said businesses in his district, especially those in the service industry, have expressed concern that if they participate in the program, their employees will not be able to pay back the bills in time.

Other businesses appear to be just as reluctant to take part in what Taylor called “a well-intentioned attempt to provide relief to Americans during the pandemic,” but one that presents numerous challenges.

Taylor said he did not know how many Arizona businesses planned to participate. Nor did O’Halleran. Van de Water said there is “no measure” yet of the number of participating businesses. The Arizona Small Business Association referred the question to the IRS, where a spokesman said it’s too early to know.

Greszler said she did not know how many companies will take part – she even had to ask her boss Tuesday if the Heritage Foundation would be participating.

“This is going to be, for some employers, a complicated decision since it has tax implications for employees into the next year,” Taylor said.


  • Camaron Stevenson

    Camaron is the Founding Editor and Chief Political Correspondent for The Copper Courier, and has worked as a journalist in Phoenix for over a decade. He also teaches multimedia journalism at the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University.

  • Olivia Munson
CATEGORIES: Uncategorized


Local News

Related Stories
Share This