Elections

This Arizona ballot measure would take major judicial elections away from voters

SCR 1044 appears to be a way to protect the Arizona Supreme Court justices who ruled to reinstate the 1864 total abortion ban.

The Arizona Supreme Court. (Photo courtesy of Arizona Supreme Court)

If passed, SCR 1044 would take away power from Arizona voters.

The Republican-majority Arizona Legislature proposed a ballot measure that would remove the voters’ right to retain or dismiss Supreme and Superior Court justices.

SCR 1044, deceptively dubbed the “Judicial Accountability Act,” was introduced in the state Senate in early February. It passed both chambers of the Republican-majority Legislature along party lines and was sent for the voters to decide in November.

If passed, it would take away Arizona voters’ right to reelect justices and instead allow justices to choose when to retire.

RELATED: GOP lawmakers bypass Hobbs to add 11 measures to ballot. What to look out for

Justices on the Arizona Supreme Court serve six-year terms, and Superior Court justices serve four-year terms. When the time comes for their respective retention elections, voters can currently decide to dismiss the judge through a simple majority.

Eliminating judicial retention elections would mean judges serve until voluntary retirement or when they are forced to retire at 70 under Arizona law.

The measure would be retroactive to the 2024 election if passed, meaning it would nullify any judicial dismissals that happen in the Nov. 5 election.

One caveat to indefinite appointments is if a justice falls out of “good behavior.” The resolution describes falling out of good behavior as a felony conviction involving fraud, bankruptcy, foreclosure, or dishonesty.

The ballot measure is seemingly a way to protect two Arizona Supreme Court Justices who are up for retention this year. Clint Bolick and Kathryn Hackett King both ruled to reinstate the 1864 total abortion ban, which was later repealed.

Progress Arizona filed a lawsuit challenging the “Judicial Accountability Act.” The lawsuit claims the act is deceptively named because it actually removes accountability.

Are you ready to vote? Make sure to check your voter registration status, see who’s on your ballot, and make a voting plan here.

Keep The Copper Courier free for everyone

If you found this story useful, would you consider supporting The Copper Courier?

Every day, our team works to provide Arizonans with free, fact-based reporting about the issues, policies, and decisions shaping life across the state. We believe everyone deserves access to trustworthy local news—not just those who can afford a subscription.

That's why you'll never hit a paywall here (though we may ask you to sign up for our newsletter). But keeping our journalism free depends on readers who believe informed communities are worth investing in.

If our reporting has helped you better understand what's happening in Arizona, please consider making a donation today. Every contribution helps us continue reporting, informing, and serving communities across the state.

Jessica Swarner
Jessica Swarner Newsletter Editor
Support our team